Explainability
Tiered decision transparency infrastructure — executive, technical, mathematical, and legal depth for institutional reviewers.
Overview
Explainability in CGOS is operational infrastructure for reviewers, not marketing copy. Decision transparency is tiered by audience, source-attributed in TAP lineage, and bounded by explicit limits in legal contexts.
Governance workflows
- Executive, technical, mathematical, and legal depth levels
- Causality graph for denials and escalations
- Source attribution in TAP reasoning lineage
- Explainability requests tied to governance events
Runtime supervision
- Runtime decision visibility for operators
- Confidence scores and calibration signals
- Drift monitoring with operator escalation paths
- Shadow mode review before production autonomy
Auditability & evidence
- Exportable explainability artifacts for auditors
- Replay comparison for decision forensics
- Not a substitute for counsel in legal contexts
- Institutional transparency without exposing model weights
Operational capabilities
- Runtime decision visibility
- Governance-linked explainability — not post-hoc excuses
- Human-readable escalation rationale
- Enterprise reviewer workflows
Operational boundaries
NerveMind CGOS provides operational governance infrastructure — awareness, traceability, and human authority — not autonomous legal interpretation or certification claims unless explicitly stated in a signed agreement.
